One of my favorite movies is Old Boy, and its director, Park
Chan-wook, is a talented filmmaker. There’s a bite to the stories he’s told,
and they’re punctuated with tight cinematography and visuals. For the longest
time I anticipated the debut of his first American film, Stoker, but it’s taken me over three months to get around to seeing
it due to its limited release. Now that I have, I can confidently report that in
most respects, Stoker met my
expectations—such as in the visual department. However, it’s also an imperfect
affair—specifically in the narrative.
The movie begins at the funeral of Richard
Stoker, father of the central character, India Stoker (Mia Wasikowska), and
husband to her mother, Evelyn (Nicole Kidman). Their mourning doesn’t last
long, as soon thereafter Richard’s brother, Charlie (Mathew Goode) moves in
with the two. Charlie appears to be a jack-of-all-trades, quickly making a good
impression on everyone save for India, whom he has taken a particular interest
in. As time goes on, India begins to mature and form a relationship with
Charlie in ways that she’d never expected before, putting her at odds with her
mother.
Stoker
is one of those films where next to no one within its
universe behaves like a completely normal human being. Each primary character
has their own issues that influence how they behave, but they aren’t exactly
the most exhilarating to watch. The movie moves at a patient pace without
feeling too long—but that’s only if you have
patience and an appreciation for the movie’s visual storytelling. It wouldn’t
be held against you if you didn’t find the characters too engaging—despite the
capable performances from the cast. In spite of their subdued mannerisms and
behaviors, the actors—especially Wasikowska and Goode—manage to compliment the
film’s often unnerving atmosphere. Admittedly, this makes it all the more
impactful whenever a shocking scene occurs.
What really stands out in the film are the
visuals. Lots of negative space, symbolism, original transitions, and clever
imagery are present, and much of the story is told through them. The abstractness
and uniqueness utilized in many of the movie’s shots and conversions add to the
creepiness value of the overall picture. There’s also an anachronistic appeal
derived from the setting of the movie and the costumes worn by the characters;
almost as if this was a story displaced in time.
The film’s themes of maturity and
corruption are touched upon in different ways—one of which unsurprisingly being
sexual. However, much akin to the film that partially influenced it, Lolita, the movie doesn’t quite reach that
point to which it seemingly is escalating to truly shake you. I admit this may
just be me, but maybe it would have been more effective had the characters (India,
precisely) not been so blasé from the beginning of the movie. This would have
made her development more impactful and organic. Nonetheless, Stoker is a success in spite of some
narrative issues due to its eerie atmosphere and immaculate imagery—which in
their own ways tell the story better than the characters and their dialogue
ever could.
A-
No comments:
Post a Comment